tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4806502804647119766.post3826108553022606377..comments2011-10-06T21:56:12.741-05:00Michael Jankehttps://profiles.google.com/100683893724446125801noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4806502804647119766.post-84530422977819268082011-10-06T21:56:12.741-05:002011-10-06T21:56:12.741-05:00The only rules are around possession and contraction. Any other apostrophe you see is just plain wrong.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4806502804647119766.post-11047983840257102202011-09-13T19:39:22.815-05:002011-09-13T19:39:22.815-05:00I&#39;ll admit that I don&#39;t understand the rules for apostrophes. <br /><br />Commas either. When I submitted the manuscript for a textbook I wrote, the editor made more comma corrections than I care to admit. Apparently my algorithm for commas (generate a random number between 4 and 7, count that many words and insert a comma) didn&#39;t impress the editor.Michael Jankehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00357905802460949707noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4806502804647119766.post-35773670720744974352011-09-13T10:49:12.329-05:002011-09-13T10:49:12.329-05:00&quot;Kudos&quot;, &quot;have nots&quot;, &quot;1930s&quot;, &quot;1940s&quot;, &quot;areas&quot;, CIOs&quot;. It seems you had an excess of apostrophes to get rid of so you scattered them around (-:<br /><br />Otherwise, nice article.Benhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10094191761311369134noreply@blogger.com