Skip to main content

No, I Don’t Want iTunes Installed. You can quit asking.

I don’t like software vendors that try to sneak software onto my computers. I really don’t like software vendors that don’t pay attention to my requests to not run in the background at startup.

This evening I came home and saw the Apple Software Update popped up on my Vista desktop:


Problem one: iTunes is check marked by default. I don’t want iTunes. I don’t need iTunes. And I don’t like having software vendors try to sneak  software onto my computers.  This isn’t unique to Vista. Apple does the same thing on OS X. It’s annoying enough that I’ll probably uninstall Quicktime and throw away the $29 that I paid for it.

Problem two: I specifically instructed Apple’s Quicktime to not automatically update, and I specifically have disabled the Quicktime service from running at startup, but somehow it ran anyway.

 Apple-Update-1 Quicktime-startup

I’ve also checked the Software Explorer in Windows Defender and the ‘Run’ registry keys for Apple related startup programs & didn’t find any. I’d sure like to know what’s triggering the Apple updater so I can nuke it.

Something makes me think that the only way I’ll get rid of this malware infestation is to search and destroy all Apple related registry keys.


  1. Finally! Somebody else that hates this as much as I do! How about the annoying Quicktime icon on the desktop - has anyone ever clicked that? And Safari always putting the icon fresh on my desktop, and never giving me an option to say "keep your screen bloat to yourself." How does this not generate a louder outcry? Its like they're the bizarro-Apple when it comes to UX-friendliness on Windows.

  2. If I remember correctly, the Apple auto-update is run from Scheduled Tasks. If you're having troubles finding where something is starting up, by the way, try AutoRuns from Sysinternals.

    - Jeff McJunkin

  3. Jeff - Thanks for the tip. I wouldn't have thought to look there. Having that sort of thing in the scheduler is a good idea. I'd rather see that than a daemon running a startup.

    Eric - I've got an unpolluted desktop also (7 icons), and like to keep it that way. That's a problem for almost all apps though.

  4. I totally agree! In my case, the Apple updater software wants me to install Safari. I do not want Safari, and consider it very bad practice to attempt a stealth install of some random piece of Apple software.

    Shame on Apple!

  5. Check the Itunes and Safafi boxes then go to the Tools menu, and select the option to disable updates for checked items.

  6. Ben -

    I've done that, but as far as I can tell, that only suppresses that particular update (version 8.2). As soon as 8.2.1 or 8.3 comes out, It'll show up again, and unless I clear the checkbox, It'll get installed.

    I've been suppressing iTunes updates on my Mac for a year now, and they keep coming back. On my Air I don't even have iTunes installed, and I've suppressed a whole bunch of iTunes re-installation attempts.

  7. Try uninstalling the Bonjour service from your computer from add/remove programs.

  8. Quicktime and Realplayer are the most pesky.If you view running processes in Task Manager, you can see them running even though you have specifically said you don't want the program checking for updates.

    autoruns from MS sysinternals is quite handy to disable these, however the entries keep returning - I suspect everytime you use them.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cargo Cult System Administration

“imitate the superficial exterior of a process or system without having any understanding of the underlying substance” --Wikipedia During and after WWII, some native south pacific islanders erroneously associated the presence of war related technology with the delivery of highly desirable cargo. When the war ended and the cargo stopped showing up, they built crude facsimiles of runways, control towers, and airplanes in the belief that the presence of war technology caused the delivery of desirable cargo. From our point of view, it looks pretty amusing to see people build fake airplanes, runways and control towers  and wait for cargo to fall from the sky.The question is, how amusing are we?We have cargo cult science[1], cargo cult management[2], cargo cult programming[3], how about cargo cult system management?Here’s some common system administration failures that might be ‘cargo cult’:Failing to understand the difference between necessary and sufficient. A daily backup is necessary, b…

Ad-Hoc Verses Structured System Management

Structured system management is a concept that covers the fundamentals of building, securing, deploying, monitoring, logging, alerting, and documenting networks, servers and applications. Structured system management implies that you have those fundamentals in place, you execute them consistently, and you know all cases where you are inconsistent. The converse of structured system management is what I call ad hoc system management, where every system has it own plan, undocumented and inconsistent, and you don't know how inconsistent they are, because you've never looked.

In previous posts (here and here) I implied that structured system management was an integral part of improving system availability. Having inherited several platforms that had, at best, ad hoc system management, and having moved the platforms to something resembling structured system management, I've concluded that implementing basic structure around system management will be the best and fastest path to …

The Cloud – Provider Failure Modes

In The Cloud - Outsourcing Moved up the Stack[1] I compared the outsourcing that we do routinely (wide area networks) with the outsourcing of the higher layers of the application stack (processor, memory, storage). Conceptually they are similar:
In both cases you’ve entrusted your bits to someone else, you’ve shared physical and logical resources with others, you’ve disassociated physical devices (circuits or servers) from logical devices (virtual circuits, virtual severs), and in exchange for what is hopefully better, faster, cheaper service, you give up visibility, manageability and control to a provider. There are differences though. In the case of networking, your cloud provider is only entrusted with your bits for the time it takes for those bits to cross the providers network, and the loss of a few bits is not catastrophic. For providers of higher layer services, the bits are entrusted to the provider for the life of the bits, and the loss of a few bits is a major problem. The…