Skip to main content

I thought I had this privacy thing figured out, but…

…maybe not.

I’m trying out the Collusion plugin for Firefox and the results are interesting. After a couple evenings of my normal surfing routine, the plugin looks like:



As expected, Google appears at or near the center of attraction.


I use the Google suite for anything related to my profession and I use Google’s competition for anything unrelated to my role as an IT professional. My theory is that as a public employee in Minnesota, pretty much everything I do professionally is public anyway, so I figure that there is no net loss to using the Google stack.  The Collusion plugin shows that I’m merging the two realms far more than I thought.

Also unexpected are several domains that I’ve never heard of, including something called imrworldwide:


I have no idea who they are, but they know more about me than I’d like.

I use Adblock Plus and NoScript plugins and I accept third party cookies, but I clear all cookies each time I close Firefox (once every few weeks), so I’ve assumed that I’m less ‘connectable’ than the typical surfer.

It looks like I’m not as segmented as I thought. I’ve added ‘Antisocial’ and ‘Adversity’ block lists to Adblock Plus.


  1. I see similar, and find that part not overly disturbing. Those linkages, in my case, come from using Google Reader; it's natural that "the big G" wind up accessing a bunch of external sources if I'm using Reader to access a bunch of RSS feeds elsewhere.

    I did some fooling around with Collusion on another Firefox instance where I was using StumbleUpon to find random stuff of interest. THAT turned into a diagram that looks rather more like a deeply intertwined nest of pests (whether you prefer rats or roaches is up to you!).

    If you're aware that you're using Google to search for stuff, it shouldn't be surprising that they know where you go next. What is entirely more disturbing are the number of services that link back to Facebook and; visit any of the "LOLCATS" or "random memes" sites and you'll find your browser pretty heavily polluted with crossreferences to such 'anti-services.'

  2. Matt, Christoper -

    Thanks for the comments.

    I was surprised by the interconnectedness. I'm not trying to drop off the map completely -- I'm really only trying to separate my personal 'persona' from my professional persona, as I'm not fond of the idea of a marketing/advertising company connecting too many dots together.

    It'll be interesting to see if the additional Adblock filters make a difference.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cargo Cult System Administration

Cargo Cult: …imitate the superficial exterior of a process or system without having any understanding of the underlying substance --Wikipedia During and after WWII, some native south pacific islanders erroneously associated the presence of war related technology with the delivery of highly desirable cargo. When the war ended and the cargo stopped showing up, they built crude facsimiles of runways, control towers, and airplanes in the belief that the presence of war technology caused the delivery of desirable cargo. From our point of view, it looks pretty amusing to see people build fake airplanes, runways and control towers  and wait for cargo to fall from the sky.
The question is, how amusing are we?We have cargo cult science[1], cargo cult management[2], cargo cult programming[3], how about cargo cult system management?Here’s some common system administration failures that might be ‘cargo cult’:
Failing to understand the difference between necessary and sufficient. A daily backup …

Ad-Hoc Versus Structured System Management

Structured system management is a concept that covers the fundamentals of building, securing, deploying, monitoring, logging, alerting, and documenting networks, servers and applications. Structured system management implies that you have those fundamentals in place, you execute them consistently, and you know all cases where you are inconsistent. The converse of structured system management is what I call ad hoc system management, where every system has it own plan, undocumented and inconsistent, and you don't know how inconsistent they are, because you've never looked.

In previous posts (here and here) I implied that structured system management was an integral part of improving system availability. Having inherited several platforms that had, at best, ad hoc system management, and having moved the platforms to something resembling structured system management, I've concluded that implementing basic structure around system management will be the best and fastest path to…

The Cloud – Provider Failure Modes

In The Cloud - Outsourcing Moved up the Stack[1] I compared the outsourcing that we do routinely (wide area networks) with the outsourcing of the higher layers of the application stack (processor, memory, storage). Conceptually they are similar:In both cases you’ve entrusted your bits to someone else, you’ve shared physical and logical resources with others, you’ve disassociated physical devices (circuits or servers) from logical devices (virtual circuits, virtual severs), and in exchange for what is hopefully better, faster, cheaper service, you give up visibility, manageability and control to a provider. There are differences though. In the case of networking, your cloud provider is only entrusted with your bits for the time it takes for those bits to cross the providers network, and the loss of a few bits is not catastrophic. For providers of higher layer services, the bits are entrusted to the provider for the life of the bits, and the loss of a few bits is a major problem. These …