Skip to main content

Missing the Point

ExtremeTech reviewed the new Fit-PC Slim.

Conclusion:

CompuLabs really needs to step up to a more modern platform if it wants to stay competitive in the rapidly growing market for small, net-top PCs.[1]

They missed the point. It's not a "net-top" or desktop replacement, it's an extremely low wattage home server.

The spec that matters:
Power consumption: 4-6W[2]
Compare that to the 50-100w of typical desktops that are used as home servers & left running 24 hours per day, or the 20+ watts of a typical notebook. Even an Eee PC uses 15 watts.

If what you need is a home server to use as a samba share, a web server or similar always-on device, a 5 watt brick looks pretty interesting. That's 500kwh/yr less power, 400kg less CO2, and $50 less on your electric bill per year than the old desktop-turned-server that you have stuffed under your desk.

And don't whine about the 500mhz processor and 500mb RAM. We ran LAMP stacks that served up more users than your house ever will on a quarter of that.



1 Extreme Tech The Ever Shrinking PC: The Fit-PC Slim
2 Slim-PC Fit Specifications

Comments

  1. 5 watts? Holy cow!

    Get one of these, a battery to charge and an inverter and you're in business.

    Finally my linux powered robot of doom will be complete.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As nice as this device is, the cost is quite high. For me in the UK after VAT and postage were added on the Linux version of this came to a whopping £250. It's a bit hard to justify that price for such a weak machine when you can get an Eee Box for less.

    I know the Eee Box couldn't quite compete for the power usage (it's around 20 watts) - but it seems a lot better value for money than the Fit-PC Slim.

    This is the only problem I see with the majority of "green" small computers, the cost is usually too high for such a weak machine. Cut the price in half and it might be more tempting.

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Matt - Yep - that would do it.

    @Alex - I suppose it depends on the price of electricity in your neighborhood. The 15w difference might not make up for the performance hit of the Fit.

    In my case, I simply need a samba share that can run a java process and an rsync process. Anything over 100mhz would work for that.

    ReplyDelete
  4. @alex,

    I built this (http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2007/09/08/untangle-asterisk-pbx-and-file-server-all-in-one/) for about £200 all-in about a year ago. It's been great.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cargo Cult System Administration

“imitate the superficial exterior of a process or system without having any understanding of the underlying substance” --Wikipedia During and after WWII, some native south pacific islanders erroneously associated the presence of war related technology with the delivery of highly desirable cargo. When the war ended and the cargo stopped showing up, they built crude facsimiles of runways, control towers, and airplanes in the belief that the presence of war technology caused the delivery of desirable cargo. From our point of view, it looks pretty amusing to see people build fake airplanes, runways and control towers  and wait for cargo to fall from the sky.The question is, how amusing are we?We have cargo cult science[1], cargo cult management[2], cargo cult programming[3], how about cargo cult system management?Here’s some common system administration failures that might be ‘cargo cult’:Failing to understand the difference between necessary and sufficient. A daily backup is necessary, b…

Ad-Hoc Verses Structured System Management

Structured system management is a concept that covers the fundamentals of building, securing, deploying, monitoring, logging, alerting, and documenting networks, servers and applications. Structured system management implies that you have those fundamentals in place, you execute them consistently, and you know all cases where you are inconsistent. The converse of structured system management is what I call ad hoc system management, where every system has it own plan, undocumented and inconsistent, and you don't know how inconsistent they are, because you've never looked.

In previous posts (here and here) I implied that structured system management was an integral part of improving system availability. Having inherited several platforms that had, at best, ad hoc system management, and having moved the platforms to something resembling structured system management, I've concluded that implementing basic structure around system management will be the best and fastest path to …

The Cloud – Provider Failure Modes

In The Cloud - Outsourcing Moved up the Stack[1] I compared the outsourcing that we do routinely (wide area networks) with the outsourcing of the higher layers of the application stack (processor, memory, storage). Conceptually they are similar:
In both cases you’ve entrusted your bits to someone else, you’ve shared physical and logical resources with others, you’ve disassociated physical devices (circuits or servers) from logical devices (virtual circuits, virtual severs), and in exchange for what is hopefully better, faster, cheaper service, you give up visibility, manageability and control to a provider. There are differences though. In the case of networking, your cloud provider is only entrusted with your bits for the time it takes for those bits to cross the providers network, and the loss of a few bits is not catastrophic. For providers of higher layer services, the bits are entrusted to the provider for the life of the bits, and the loss of a few bits is a major problem. The…